NAS Workshop – Integrated Education (STEM, Liberal Arts, etc.)

I have been asked to present an industry perspective on the need for T-shaped skills at a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) workhop on “STEM Integration Into The Liberal Arts.”

Here is my presentation: https://www.slideshare.net/spohrer/nas-integrated-education-20170406-v7

Here is a podcast (Dave Goldberg, Big Beacon/Whole New Engineer): https://www.voiceamerica.com/episode/98248/exploring-service-science-and-cognitive-systems-an-interview-with-jim-spohrer

In industry, we see the need for business, engineering, social scientists, communications, and legal/policy people to work together and interact a lot on nearly every project. For example, when IBM communications department posted this about Quantum Computing advances http://research.ibm.com/ibm-q/ – behind the scenes, all the above and more had to interact.  In the age of accelerations, this becomes more and more true – just think of driverless cars and Uber – if you like controversies.

A range of people study or work to improve this “need for diverse interactions.”

Some call it interactional expertise: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactional_expertise

Some call it T-shapes and empathy: http://chiefexecutive.net/ideo-ceo-tim-brown-t-shaped-stars-the-backbone-of-ideoae%E2%84%A2s-collaborative-culture/

At IBM, we like T-shapes, and the diversity is not just disciplines, but systems,and cultures as well: http://service-science.info/archives/3328

Of course, integrated education is hard to design – it is hard for a single person to learn just one discipline or area deeply, but to learn several requires a polymath – and too often they are broad not deep, good for connecting, but less so for solving problems that require deep understanding: https://www.wired.com/2013/12/165191/

To achieve integrated education will require a vision and a process, a process that works just a little bit, year over year to eventually get closer and closer to the goal of integrated education – I have called this a Moore’s law for education (not sure if you can access Example 1 on education here http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2006/7/5871-service-systems-service-scientists-ssme-and-innovation/fulltext) – and the details have been part of service science.   Simply put, service science is about improving our ability to play win-win or positive sum games through a better understanding of socio-technical system evolution and design.  Socio-technical systems of people and technology interconnected by value propositions are known as service systems.   The need for T-shaped people to advance service science and service innovation was written about in this report from University of Cambridge some years ago – notice figure 1 on the gaps beween academic disciplines especially: http://www.ceri.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Cambridge_T-Shaped.pdf

 

Additional Readings

Miller RK. Why the Hard Science of Engineering is No Longer Enough to Meet the 21 st Century Challenges. Olin College of Engineering. 2015 May.
http://www.olin.edu/sites/default/files/rebalancing_engineering_education_may_15.pdf
Kline SJ. Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking. Stanford University Press; 1995.
http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2011/114500.pdf

Friedman TL (2016) Thank-you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations.  NY: Farrae, Stauss, Grioux.
https://www.amazon.com/Thank-You-Being-Late-Accelerations/dp/0374273537/

 

Also watch and listen to these two items:

Jim Corgel on the Right Attitude and Skill Set https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm3cqVuOqMQ

SYSK Empathy: http://www.stuffyoushouldknow.com/podcasts/empathy.htm

 

For Ashley Bear.

National Academies Study Committee on the Integration of Education in STEM, Humanities, and Arts at the Undergraduate and Graduate Levels

(Arizona State University; Life Sciences Building Room C202; C Wing 401 E. Tyler Mall; Tempe, Arizona; Thursday, April 6th, 2017)

Sharing Information in the Digital Age

The key question:
Who may
share what information with whom for what purpose in what context and be on firm legal ground?

(1) Who may – in the digital age we can all capture and share information more easily.

(2) what information- even information that is captured digitally can be altered, or opinions can be associated with it.

(3) with whom – sometimes it is OK to share information with some people, but not others.

(4) purpose – the intention of the sharing may be important, in many cases

(5) context – this may override other factors, such as in a disaster situation – when normal rules do not apply.

(6) on firm legal ground – this is what title companies do for real property.

What is Title Insurance? – Stewart Title
Quote: Title insurance protects real estate owners and lenders against any property loss or damage they might experience because of liens, encumbrances or defects in the title to the property. Each title insurance policy is subject to specific terms, conditions and exclusions.

 

Who offers title insurance on real property and how did that come to be?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_insurance

 

Who offers title insurance on information?  UNKNOWN

Provenance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provenance

Information Provenance: http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Information_provenance

IBM Knowledge Center: Provenance information
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSXVXZ/com.ibm.i2.anb.doc/descriptions.html

 

The world is a messy place with other people’s data and property all over the place – Google ran into this with Glass –

Scroll down to Privacy Concerns: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Glass

Quote: Additionally, there is controversy that Google Glass would cause security problems and violate privacy rights.[86][87][88] Organizations like the FTC Fair Information Practice work to uphold privacy rights through Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPS), which are guidelines representing concepts that concern fair information practice in an electronic marketplace.[89]

Also see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTC_Fair_Information_Practice

Quote: 4. Integrity/Security[14] Information collectors should ensure that the data they collect is accurate and secure. They can improve the integrity of data by cross-referencing it with only reputable databases and by providing access for the consumer to verify it. Information collectors can keep their data secure by protecting against both internal and external security threats. They can limit access within their company to only necessary employees to protect against internal threats, and they can use encryption and other computer-based security systems to stop outside threats.[14]

For commercial and legal purposes, every time we share digital information via email, social media, etc., we may want to have a record of the sharing event which is automatically added to a blockchain. Is this practical? desireable? viable?  Questions: Should we, can we, may we, will we?

What if the person we share the information with – does not read it, process it, understand it? What if they don’t want to receive it?

Some additional readings:

Benefits that search engines get – users must actively opt out:
http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/1457-Search-Engines-Indexing-and-Copyright-Law

Type of information matters:
Malin B, Karp D, Scheuermann RH (2010) Technical and policy approaches to balancing patient privacy and data sharing in clinical and translational research. Journal of Investigative Medicine. 58(1):11-8.
HAT – Hub of All Things – “Own Your Data” – http://hubofallthings.com/main/
Context matters:
Harvard Humanitarian Initiative (2010) Disaster Relief 2.0: The future of information sharing in humanitarian emergencies. In Disaster Relief 2.0: The future of information sharing in humanitarian emergencies  (pp. 72-72).
Implications for development:

What is a “busy fee earner”? Read this here.

The Future of Business Education

The Future of Business Education Isn’t What You Think It Is: How Cognitive Systems and Industry 4.0 Will Revolutionize Management.

In the age of accelerations, the best way to predict the future is to inspire the next generation of students and early career talent to build a better world (Friedman 2017).  Building a better world requires grit and better building blocks, and perhaps even heroism at times ( Duckworth 2016; Hatch 2013; Lowney 2010; Hannibal, 2017).   Artificial Intelligence/Intelligence augmentation, virtual reality/augmented reality, blockchain/open technologies, and material/energy systems provide these new building blocks (Domingos 2015; Antunes 2012).  In the corner of my garage, there is a stack of boxes my wife is after me to throw out.  Old stereos, sound systems, albums, cameras, video recorders, computers, and more that I paid many thousands of dollars for as a struggling student then early career professional over the years.  Today my smartphone provides all these functions, and more – such as speech translation from other languages – at a fraction of the earlier cost (Gada 2017; Gershuny 2003).   By 2035, no one can yet predict the form factor of your mobile device, but projections indicate that it will have an exascale of computing power – the computing power estimate of one person’s brain (Friedman 2017; Norman 1993). Let’s explore together the implications of cognitive systems and Industry 4.0 on the future of business education. (Hint: Faculty and students will need to become more T-shaped!).

References:

Antunes S (2012) DIY Satellite Platforms: Building a Space-Ready General Base Picosatellite for Any Mission. O’Reilly Media.
https://www.amazon.com/DIY-Satellite-Platforms-Space-Ready-Picosatellite/dp/1449310605/

Domingos P (2015) The master algorithm: How the quest for the ultimate learning machine will remake our world. Basic Books.
https://www.amazon.com/Master-Algorithm-Ultimate-Learning-Machine/dp/0465065708/

Duckworth A (2016) GRIT: The power of passion and perseverance. NY,NY: Simon & Schuster, Scribner.
https://www.amazon.com/Grit-Passion-Perseverance-Angela-Duckworth/dp/1501111108

Gada, K (2017 forth coming) ATOM: Technology deflation.  ISSIP Business Expert Press.
https://technomedium.wordpress.com/author/kmg4/

Gershuny J (2003) Changing times: Work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford University Press.
https://www.amazon.com/Changing-Times-Leisure-Postindustrial-Society/dp/019926189X

Hannibal, ME (2017) Citizen Scientist: Searching for Heroes and Hope in an Age of Extinction Kindle Edition. The Experiment Press.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01B3VMD04/

Hatch M (2013) The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. McGraw Hill Professional.
https://www.amazon.com/Maker-Movement-Manifesto-Innovation-Tinkerers/dp/0071821120/

Friedman TL (2017) Thank you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
https://www.amazon.com/Thank-You-Being-Late-Accelerations/dp/0374273537/

Lowney C (2010) Heroic leadership: Best practices from a 450-year-old company that changed the world. Loyola Press.
https://www.amazon.com/Heroic-Leadership-Practices-450-Year-Old-Company/dp/0829421157/

Norman DA (1993) Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Basic Books.
https://www.amazon.com/Things-That-Make-Smart-Attributes/dp/0201626950

For even more readings:

Top 10:  http://service-science.info/archives/4416

Holiday 2016: http://service-science.info/archives/4333

Jobs of the Future: http://service-science.info/archives/4430

For relevant presentation see: 

IBM Welcome and Cognitive Futures
https://www.slideshare.net/spohrer/ibm-welcome-and-cognitive-20170322-v7

Per request of Timothy Keiningham

Zanker Recycling Center

Great tour guide for Zanker Recycling Center: Jerame Renteria (with support from Michael Gross)

Lorenzo Napoleone and Federico Columbro (U Rome Tor Vergata) are working on waste management as a smart service system so we were lucky to get a tour of Zanker Recycling today.

Suited up and ready to get in the van.

 

Hot compressed air separator

 

inside the belly of the beast – the digestor – creating methane (and smells) to power Zanker Recycling

 

75 tons per hour of construction and demolition waste – separated

 

seagulls on treadmill in background

For those who would like to know more trash talk – I recommend “Stuff You Should Know” podcasts episodes below:

SYSK: How landfills work

SYSK: How plasma waste converters work

SYSK: Recycling and the Great Pacific Garbage Patch

SYSK: E-Waste Video

and my presentation on Manufacturing as a Local Recycling Service

also see Circular Economy video

largest anaerobic digestion facility in the world at Zanker Recycling

From IBM Almaden: Jim Spohrer, Federico Columbro, Lorenzo Napoleone, Spike Narayan, Obinna Anya, Barry Eberly.

From SJSU:  Jacob Tsao,  Femi Aluko

Cognitive OpenTech

Whether we know it or not, and most of us don’t, we will all soon be building our own personal cognitive systems.   Nearly everyone is on a journey as a developer/maker/citizen scientist/data wrangler/lifelong learner/T-shaped service scientist…  people with depth for problem solving and breadth for empathy and communication skills, evolving to work better on multidisciplinary, multisystem, multiculture teams to take on larger and larger challenges.

We will build them, and they will know us well, and keep our data private.  We will be able to build them, because the building blocks are getting better fast.   For example, just sixty years ago it required the combined resources of a nation to put a satellite into orbit. And now it is rapidly becoming something that a single teenager can aspire to do – from DIY satellite to DIY rocketry.  Making the world safe and secure, and escaping fear of harm from others is one of the biggest challenges we face.  Making tools to solve our most pressing problems is getting easier and easier as the building blocks get better – rebuilding society from scratch is becoming easier, not harder, to imagine.

Cognitive Open Technology building blocks (Cognitive OpenTech) are getting better, and they include a wide range of capabilities as a service: Augmented Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Exoskeleton Clothing, Maker/Rapid Rebuild Tools, etc.

However, there are still many unsolved grand challenges remaining: http://service-science.info/archives/4447

These challenges are best approached as an open ecosystem of collaborators, working on technology as a service – see https://www.partnershiponai.org/

Regarding Open Technology – if you have 90 minutes, you really should watch this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9FSqVbdHis

Agenda

0:00-2:00
Intro animation

2:00-3:00
Sam Ramji (Google, VP Product Development – Developer and Compute Platform)

3:00-7:00
Sarah Novotny (Google, Program Manager – Kubernetes Community Development, Google Cloud)

8:00-15:00
Vint Cerf (Google, VP and Chief Internet Evangelist)

15:00-22:00
Jim Zemlin (The Linux Foundation, Executive Director)

22:00-31:00
Eric Brewer (Google, VP Infrastructure)
(26:00 – Thousands of Googlers contributed to 1000’s of open source projects in 2016)

31:00-40:00
Chris Wright (RedHat, VP and Chief Technologist)

40:00-47:00
Jeff Dean (Google, Senior Fellow)
(4000 projects use TensorFlow insider Google today)
(I think this means: Google promotes “open” as key to employees, customers, developers, researchers, universities, and citizen science. The distinction between employees and customers may decrease over time as everyone becomes a developer/lifelong learner)

47:00-55:00
Rajat Monga  (Google, Principle Engineer)
Examples including skin cancer detection and eye disease:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v542/n7639/full/nature21056.html
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2588763

51:00-1:04:00
Sam Ramji (Google, VP Product Development – Developer and Compute Platform)
“Best time in history to be a developer – craft is respected”
“Age of open source – fast innovation.”
“Days of committing to a closed ecosystem are over”

1:04:00-1:05:00
Alison Wagonfeld (Google, VP Marketing – Google Cloud)

1:05:00-1:14:00
Will Marshall (Planet, CEO)
Satellites to map the surface of Earth.

1:14:00-1:19:30
Willem Sundblad (Oden Technologies, CEO)
Empowering manufacturers with data

1:19:30-1:26:00
Herman Narula (Improbable, CEO)
SpatialOS – Simulation of cities for policy making, game development platform

1:26:00-1:32:00
Alison Wagonfeld (Google, VP Marketing – Google Cloud)
Anthony Goldbloom (Kaggle, Co-Founder and CEO)
Scaling up to deep learning from simpler machine learning

1:32:00-1:30:00
Alison Wagonfeld (Google, VP Marketing – Google Cloud)
Santi Subotovsky (Emergence Capital, Managing Partner)
Matt Ocko (Data Collective, Managing Partner)
Last ten minutes is VC funding for microservices on cognitive open tech…

Fei-Fei Li (former Stanford, Chief Scientist, Google Cloud for AI)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgqgdddl018

11:00 “…democratizing compute, algorithms, data, models, talent and expertise.”
12:00 “…model for AI… best papers for AI competition – quickly turned into products and services.”
13:00 “vision API and meta-data from Google search to recognize entities in Google Knowledge Graph”
14:43 “video-intelligence API – Sara Robinson, scene changes in video”
Sheep dogs and mops – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1xNTLH1zlA

These are also important:

OpenWhisk for serveless microservices

BonnyCI for rapid rebuilding

Jupyter Notebook and used by DSx (Data Science Experience)

Sonnet is open now too.

CIO’s are using AI and Open Technologies to continuously improve their organizations:

CIO: https://dupress.deloitte.com/dup-us-en/focus/tech-trends/2017/moving-beyond-artificial-intelligence.html

Go Nat Friedman – $5K grants for Open AI projects: https://nat.org/aigrant-get-5-000-for-your-open-source-ai-project-1118dd7db083

Open source AI/ML/DL for smarter/wiser service systems is a passion, including circular economy and rapidly rebuilding from scratch for sustainability and resilience of systems – helping all nations become energy independent is a key first step, and geothermal needs to be 100x cheaper than today, but that is a good challenge to work on….

Some online talks

Some recorded talks:

2016 Almaden – Cognitive Systems: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1KD_cliGeU&t=333s

2015 Almaden – Better Building Blocks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQbgALl-OE&t=536s

2015 Italy – Future: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvjLRIg_9HY

2015 TokyoTech – Smart Service Systems: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7PVBGtEYyg

2014 Talent from Real World Challenges: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kvxG-uTXEk

2013 Service Science – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaLOSty4IZY

2013 ISSIP – New Member: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27qZPDG0Bp8

2013 Panel – Emerging Technology: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow6iM1hJFmA

2011 CITRIS – Skills: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwqHDuAIbzU

2011 MPICT – Skills: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL4G6JEICEc&t=12s

2009 California Hillside – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6i8IMXP1Go

 

More here:

SpohrerOnForum2009
https://www.youtube.com/user/SpohrerOnForum2009/videos?sort=dd&view=0&shelf_id=0

and here:
https://www.youtube.com/user/Rw3DANC3R

In memory- 20 second mark – Bob Lusch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUS5GX5GSY4

Disruption: A service science blog bookmark

(1) On Irene Ng’s “The Markets to Redesign” – personal data, share manufactured things, and drugs/pharma all need disruption for sure, and in next decade human microbiome may disrupt pharma finally and permanently…  https://bizresearcher.wordpress.com/2016/12/02/the-markets-to-redesign/

and

Innovation Caucus tool – to help disrupt interconnected path dependent business models in industries: https://innovateuk.blog.gov.uk/2016/09/28/innovation-beyond-things-and-widgets/
For more see, 55 Jobs of the future: http://www.futuristspeaker.com/business-trends/55-jobs-of-the-future/

The Dismantlers: Prison System Dismantlers, Hospital and Healthcare Dismantlers, Income Tax System Dismantlers, Government Agency Dismantlers

More: http://service-science.info/archives/4430

(2)  On Gautam Mahajan’s disruption value tree and disruption of industries, I have also enjoyed these four items a great deal:

(a) Routine labor industry: What will everyone do with 100 digital workers each by 2055? http://www.odbms.org/blog/2017/02/on-digital-labor-technology-challenges-and-opportunities-interview-with-michael-henry/

(b) Efficiency of different types of capital for disruption and better explanations:
Hunter Hastings (with Jeff Saperstein) ISSIP BEP book author – writes, presents, and speaks about…
Entrepreneurial super intelligence: https://www.slideshare.net/secret/1zlyo9GREvHBzd
Audio: https://mises.org/system/tdf/Hastings_20170317.mp3?file=1&type=audio
Ray Dalio (BridgeWater): http://fortune.com/2016/12/24/bridgewater-ray-dalio-algorithm/
George Gilder (Scandal of Money): https://www.amazon.com/Scandal-Money-Street-Recovers-Economy-ebook/dp/B01C91169Q/
Hunter wrote: “A major thought of his [Gilder] is that trading financial assets does not add new knowledge to the economy, and it is new knowledge that makes the economy grow, and creates jobs. Entrepreneurs are engaged in conducting what he calls falsifiable experiments that become learning and knowledge. Therefore, venture capital is the most valuable money in the economy. He quotes Peter Thiel’s numbers: venture capital is less than 0.2% of total capital, but has seeded companies that now produce 21% of GDP, 65% of market capitalization and 17% of all jobs (that last number is probably under-estimated, notes Gilder).”
David Deutsch (Beginning of Infinity): http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/14/books/review/the-beginning-of-infinity-by-david-deutsch-book-review.html
Robert Wright (Evolution of God): http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/books/review/Bloom-t.html

(c) Government funding needed – taxes can go away by 2035: technology deflation: salvation or death trap…
https://technomedium.wordpress.com/author/kmg4/

(d) Government enforces responsible behavior – innovate responsibility – complex system have capabilities and constraints; service systems have rights and responsibilities, too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2DqEjqnnvk

More: http://service-science.info/archives/4463

Built on top of:

(1) Irene Ng’s Value and Worth (price – money – what people are willing to pay for something) is a helpful framework for your work in my mind.
https://www.amazon.com/Value-Worth-Creating-Markets-Digital-ebook/dp/B00ARK1LSI/

(2) The tree-diagrams that lead to industries is also a nice direction to pursue to highlight some aspects of the systems dynamics.   I like the the work of John Sterman for modeling some of these disruptinve dynamics…
https://www.amazon.com/Business-Dynamics-Systems-Thinking-Modeling/dp/007238915X

(3) The industry level analysis might also benefit from looking at Basole and Rouse:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/acb2/a0038c13f1eb0cc83d332e880b6e896b5761.pdf

(4) Paul Maglio and I are approaching the problem from the perspective of a simulation of the evolving ecology of service system entities – we have been brainstorming for years about how units-analysis (miles/gallon, bits/joule) etc. and other units based key performance indicators of smarter service systems evolve over time.   There is still a lot of work to do on this, but my inspiration for keeping at the task is the inspiration I draw from Kline’s book below – which discuss human-techno-extension factors and socio-technical-system design loops accelerating as more units get integrated into systems…

Kline SJ (1995) Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking. Stanford University Press.  OK, summary here – but the book is much better: http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2011/114500.pdf

The following book is the best treatment of B2B KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) I have read across industries, and also highlights the importance of units analysis in B2B KPIs… businesses that can intelligently evolve their KPIs over time, do better as disruptive innovators, than those who use overly simplistics KPIs that do not evolve, in general.   https://www.amazon.com/Value-Merchants-Demonstrating-Documenting-Superior/dp/1422103358

My current service science projects

I am currently working with ISSIP colleagues globally (http://issip.org)…

My projects include:

(1) working to design a framework for  smarter/wiser service systems – see:
http://www.servicescienceprojects.org/ISSIPNSF/index.html

– key is everyone has a cognitive mediator (digital cognitive system) – see:
https://www.slideshare.net/spohrer/understanding-20170104-v10

– working to have IBM and open source AI community build above – see:
http://service-science.info/archives/4489

– trust will be key (cartoon) – see:
http://service-science.info/archives/4498

– MAK. Siddike (JAIST) and sensei, K. Iwano (Mitsubishi), K. Hidaka (TokyoTech), etc. are some key collaborators on this

(2) in discussion with Paul Maglio (UC Merced) on service science textbook:

– based on a “world simulator” idea  – the evolving ecology of service system entities – past, present, future(s) (need to write up better)

– types of innovation (increment, radical, super-radical) based on units analysis (need to write up)

– exploration of ideas of alternative past(s) based on rapidly rebuilding from scratch in wiser service systems (need to write up better).

(3) working with Haluk Demirkan (U Washington) on too many projects to mention all:

– ISSIP BEP book collection on service systems and innovation for business and society – see:
http://www.issip.org/books-and-collections/

– Weekly Speaker Series – see:
http://www.issip.org/learning-center/2602-2/issip-service-innovation-weekly-speaker-series/

– Closely related Speaker Series lead by Dianne Fodell – see:
http://cognitive-science.info/community/weekly-update/

– T-shaped work, this include Lou Freund (SJSU) and Phil Gardner (MSU) on several related projects – see: http://tsummit.org/t

– Future-ready T-shaped adaptive innovators also connects to several platform and startup and mentoring efforts – based on the concept of better building blocks for smarter/wiser service systems – see: https://www.slideshare.net/spohrer/silicon-vikings-20170307-v2

– AEIOU (Abstract Entity Interaction Outcome Universals) framework (need to write up better)

The goal is to advance service science and cognitive science to realize smarter/wiser service systems.

 

Trust

Trust – civilization is built on it – not to mention the evolving ecology of service system entities.

Subscribe to the Economist: http://www.economist.com/news/world-week/21718577-kals-cartoon

Economist Cartoon

 

Partnership on AI Tenets: https://www.partnershiponai.org/tenets/
Ensuring that AI research and technology is robust, reliable, trustworthy, and operates within secure constraints.

Upcoming Talk at Computer History Museum by Grady Booch “I’m Sorry, Dave. I’m Afraid I Can’t Do That”
http://www.computerhistory.org/events/upcoming/

Coming to an open source AI download site near you – GitHub’s DIY AI Friend is an interesting concept. Already being marketed by several companies: https://www.sitepoint.com/how-to-build-your-own-ai-assistant-using-api-ai/

Not to mention a crisis in trust of institutions: http://www.theworldin.com/article/10508/crisis-trust

Talent hunt

Looking for early career and second career talent who would like to spend a year in Silicon Valley working on open source AI (artificial intelligence) projects, such as:
(1) software-defined data-centers for AI workloads
(2) open source AI smartphone assistance for automatic generation of resume/CV/annual-performance review writeups
(3) predicting scientific discoveries and redoing re-discovery with open/fewer resources
(4) open source AI smartphone apps and startup ideas
(5) individuals owning and monetizing all their personal data and citizen science twist
(6) trust, privacy, and security of personal AI data systems
(7) grand challenges of AI:
(7a) experience traces – external and internal representation of all experiences
(7b) episodic memory – trusted and socially acceptable store for all a person’s experience
(7c) commonsense reasoning – fast general understanding of physical and social worlds
(7d) social interactions – requires social commonsense
(7e) conversational search – better than keyword search conversations on any topic
(7f) ingest textbooks – ingest and apply academic knowledge
(7g) ingest lawbooks – ingest and apply institutional knowledge
(7h) collaborative coaching – people perform better when tool removed

Applicants should have deep knowledge and experience using an open source AI system, such as:

TensorFlow: https://www.openhub.net/p/tensorflow
MXNet: https://www.openhub.net/p/mxnet
Theano: https://www.openhub.net/p/theano
Caffe: https://www.openhub.net/p/caffe
deeplearning4J: https://www.openhub.net/p/deeplearning4j
H20: https://www.openhub.net/p/h2o-3
SystemML: https://www.openhub.net/p/apache-systemml

Some open source AI systems and communities

Ideal for a career transition/resume building experience.